powered by Surfing Waves

    Labels

    Affiliate (1) Amazon Store (3) Borneo Post Online Borneo (13273) Free (1) Free Money (2) Healthy (1) How to (1) IFTTT (14280) Lowyat.NET Lowyatt (1003) Money (1) Utama (1341) YouTube (22)

    As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

    Monetize - Make Money Online is a participant in the Amazon Services LLC Associates Program, an affiliate advertising program designed to provide a means for sites to earn advertising fees by advertising and linking to affiliate-program.amazon.com

    Search

    Wednesday, September 2, 2020

    CME perplexed about proposed property vacancy tax

    Dr Carmelo Ferlito

    KUCHING: The Center for Market Education (CME) expressed concerns over the proposal put forward by the Ministry of Housing and Local Government on a property vacancy tax to be paid by developers on unsold units priced above RM 500,000.

    CME chief executive officer Dr Carmelo Ferlito opined that such a tax should not be put forward.

    “It cannot even be defined as a tax, as a tax is always an amount of money paid after a certain benefit has been enjoyed. Income taxes, in example, are paid after an income has been produced,” he said in a statement.

    “But even taxes that can be defined as “punishments” for the production of negative externalities are imposed after a benefit has been enjoyed: for example, a pollution tax is imposed to polluting firms after they have obtained an output with polluting production methods; a tax on tobacco is paid by someone enjoying the pleasure of smoking, and so on.

    “In the case of a property vacancy tax, therefore, the very reason for a tax is lacking: which benefits are the developers enjoying by not selling their units? In fact, unsold units are already a missed profit for developers.”

    Ferlito added that the proposed tax can be configurated as a violation of property rights. In fact, built units belong to their legitimate owner, who has to be free to choose to hold the property if the price emerging in the market is not satisfactory for him or her.

    “Such a tax would constitute a dangerous precedent, suggesting that the government can address the way in which individuals dispose of their legitimate properties if such a usage is not in line with government’s ideas,” he explained.

    “The proposed tax could discourage future initiatives. In fact, while the housing market is now suffering, the cycle will eventually turn and the vacancy tax could discourage the emergence of sound entrepreneurial initiatives for fear of taxation on eventual unsold units.”

    The Center for Market Education invites the government to avoid implementing the proposed tax and remains at disposal for discussing together proposals that could be benefit the housing market and the Malaysian economy.

    The post CME perplexed about proposed property vacancy tax appeared first on Borneo Post Online.



    from Borneo Post Online https://bit.ly/3bkVaaX
    via IFTTT

    No comments:

    Post a Comment